Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home donate | Forums | FAQs | Contributions | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright | Contact | Volunteer Positions | Jobs | Bios
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: snow_and_rain Date: August 30, 2012 10:29:22am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: True or false?

4/28/71 has the tightest, most electrifying, most exactly perfect version of That's It for the Other One ever performed.

If not, what beats it?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: elbow1126 Date: August 30, 2012 10:37:13am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Mr. Tell, please step to the microphone

Tightest? maybe. most electrifying? I think Mr. Tell may have a different thought on this.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Cliff Hucker Date: August 30, 2012 10:42:33am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

False.

If not more electrifying, the rendition of The Other One from Radio Luxe on 5/16/72 is tighter and performed with more precision.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Skobud Date: August 30, 2012 10:51:45am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

Uhggg snow, you how much I love 4/28 but I'm giving the edge to 4/15/70, which I chose for DDP 10. To quote what I wrote:

" I believe Phil was the key to this evening’s performance. He really leads the way pretty much throughout, and especially through the whole Cryptical sequence. That Jam in fast 8’s is probably one of the hottest things the band has ever done, and amongst my very favorite."

I think this and 3/1/69 are tighter and more electrifying - but I don't know about more perfect - by that I mean more precise.

This post was modified by Skobud on 2012-08-30 17:51:45

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: snow_and_rain Date: August 30, 2012 11:45:25am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

I'll just add this: I know of few if any versions where each change of theme, each spontaneous arpeggio to spill forth from Garcia's brain, is so quickly and eagerly embraced by all members of the band. I'm stunned every time I hear it.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: August 30, 2012 11:51:20am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

The balls to the wall energy cannot be exceeded by 12/29/68, as elb alludes; as for "tightness", I dunno...I do know that 2/11/69 has the TIGHTEST 11 though.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: thekind78 Date: August 30, 2012 02:44:39pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

Don't you think 02/12/69 has that honor?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: August 30, 2012 03:11:02pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

Excellent second place? Both GREAT!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: thekind78 Date: August 30, 2012 04:12:33pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

Something must be said about the disparity between the length of the two - 2/12/69's version is nearly 2x the time of the previous night's. I can't get enough of the tune, hence, may be a bit biased towards the longer version. Of course, there really are no less than stellar versions of this song.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Cliff Hucker Date: August 30, 2012 06:34:29pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

2/12/69 is my favorite perfomance of The Eleven, though I cannot imagine how it could be mistaken for a tight rendition...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: thekind78 Date: August 30, 2012 07:13:57pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

How so? By 'tight' do we mean 'concise'? Even then, there's little rambling involved, aside from the intro jam which still seems pretty sharp and focused to me.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Cliff Hucker Date: August 30, 2012 09:23:55pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

How so?

Garcia has broken a string. He's absent for nearly 3/4 of the song. Weir slashes leads admirably, making for a blistering hot and unique rendition. But it's certainly not even close to tight playing...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: wisconsindead Date: August 31, 2012 09:04:13am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: True or false?

DP 8, 1970-05-02 would probably get my vote. Its pretty fucking amazing.

And if were talking just TOO, then how about good old 1978-02-05 (DP 18). That is a super tight monster of an other one. And most certainly as electrifying as any other one ever got.

And if we want to speak on pure epic-ness. The TOO from 1972-09-17 (DP 23) takes the ultimate cake, i cant think of too many jams that can even compare let alone be considered in the same ball park.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)