|
Poster:
|
quigs |
Date:
|
August 19, 2009 06:55:24pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
use the one w/o TCM watermark
|
Poster:
|
guyzilla |
Date:
|
August 19, 2009 07:40:01pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
That's the way I usually play it. Ain't it the way it works though? Record a movie off of TCM and your recording will look better than a copy on vhs bought in a store. But there's that damn watermark!
|
Poster:
|
quigs |
Date:
|
August 19, 2009 08:01:30pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
how true. Similar to a dog who has to pee-it leaves a watermark.
|
Poster:
|
Video-Cellar |
Date:
|
August 19, 2009 10:11:09pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
That's what its all about. Marking their territory
|
Poster:
|
quigs |
Date:
|
August 19, 2009 10:12:49pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
yes indeed.
|
Poster:
|
guyzilla |
Date:
|
August 20, 2009 01:21:43am |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
You think maybe that's why they call it a watermark? Because some company weeweed on a movie?
|
Poster:
|
quigs |
Date:
|
August 20, 2009 10:18:24am |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
Most probable. We in Arizona call it a "bug" but water mark is good too.
|
Poster:
|
Moongleam |
Date:
|
August 20, 2009 12:40:39pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
The watermarks or logos can be covered up using AviSynth and VirtualDub.
|
Poster:
|
Detective John Carter of Mars |
Date:
|
August 20, 2009 01:07:40pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
Do those change the rights status too?
|
Poster:
|
guyzilla |
Date:
|
August 20, 2009 02:50:01pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
I would think so because if the logo is obscured then the trademark holder can't claim infringement on something that isn't there. Just my opinion of course.
|
Poster:
|
Detective John Carter of Mars |
Date:
|
August 22, 2009 01:38:18pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
it's not "theirs" anymore?!
|
Poster:
|
guyzilla |
Date:
|
August 23, 2009 07:21:08pm |
|
Forum:
|
feature_films
|
Subject:
|
Re: Are these PD? (second posting) |
Not if the film wasn't "theirs" to begin with.