Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back

View Post [edit]

Poster:	Diana Hamilton	Date:	August 12, 2009 02:09:20pm
Forum:	DriveInMovieAds	Subject:	Re: Drive-In clips earlier removed

in past tense. Removed. ...stuff that used to be here but has since vanished.

Right, I just looked back in the logs, and there was a set of around 60 pulled concurrently last October.

Reply to this post

Reply [edit]

Poster:	guyzilla	Date:	August 13, 2009 04:19:00pm
Forum:	DriveInMovieAds	Subject:	Re: Drive-In clips earlier removed

Ive given this a lot of thought since this controversy started and as far as I'm concerned, if any of these items get pulled, it won't be me pulling them. They're here to stay until IA staff decides they should go, and that goes for anything else I put up unless, of course, I find out whatever it is ain't PD. Other than that, everything I put up is yours, FOREVER!!

Reply to this post

Reply [edit]

Poster:	NoiseCollector	Date:	August 09, 2010 11:19:11am
Forum:	DriveInMovieAds	Subject:	Re: Drive-In clips earlier removed

Watermarks are evil. For the most part I use public domain and creative commons whenever possible but for noncommercial satirical purposes I use copyrighted stuff all the time and not once has anyone, including youtube, ever had a problem. The merchandise that the original poster in this thread sells looks like actual cellulose film stock and I fail to see how me or anyone else using a 3 second clip of a intermission in one of my videos impedes on their ability to make a living selling it. If anything, it creates interest in the original work. If everyone used creative commons attribution we could bring hollywood to it's knees.