Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back

View Post [edit]

Poster:	Ethan P.	Date:	December 14, 2003 04:32:06am
Forum:	etree	Subject:	Re: Modify blanket mp3 statements

scwhilly on the 'groove is putting that on his stuff, flogging molly is one of the ones i saw he had taped (which is where the info is from)

Reply to this post

Reply [edit]

Poster:	Diana Hamilton	Date:	December 16, 2003 10:27:35am
Forum:	etree	Subject:	Re: Modify blanket statement- flogging molly

12/15: Thanks for the heads up, the gentleman may not have even heard about the opt-out idea on specific tapes yet. I gather fewer people read the recent proposal than the earlier unfortunate flamewar.

Meanwhile that band is not even OK'd for the LMA yet anyway.

12/16 Update: This one has been happily resolved by personal communication, in light of current ideas. Meanwhile FM is still pending anyway- but Schwilly's taping helped me pitch to 'em. :) Cross fingers on that...

This post was modified by Diana Hamilton on 2003-12-16 18:27:35

Reply to this post

Reply [edit]

Poster:	thoman8r	Date:	December 14, 2003 10:56:49pm
Forum:	etree	Subject:	Re: Modify blanket mp3 statements

Thanks for the heads up, the gentleman may not have even heard about the opt-out idea on specific tapes yet. I gather fewer people read the recent proposal than the earlier unfortunate flamewar.

I think a lot fewer. The way this was originally handled left a lot to be desired (not talking about you Diana), and I'm afraid may have permanently scared off some tapers no matter what the outcome is.

Reply to this post

Reply [edit]

Poster:	Diana Hamilton	Date:	December 14, 2003 11:36:46pm
Forum:	etree	Subject:	Re: Educate re current LMA proposal

You're right, there's probably a mixture of guys who would be negative no matter what vs. a group just wanting to "protect" their own tapes- the latter case now accomodated by current LMA idea.

For people in the second group not getting the message yet, I'd recommend anyone trader seeing a no-archive note in an info file give a nice heads up to the taper about the current thinking:

http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=10746

No reason to have a misunderstanding from an old flamewar be perpetuated. Sound good?