<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Internet Archive Forums: Prelinger Archives Forum</title>
    <link>http://feeds.archive.org/details/prelinger#forum</link>
    <description>
      The most recent posts from the IA forum: Prelinger Archives Forum    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <webMaster>info@archive.org</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:01:26 UTC</pubDate>

        <item>
      <title>How much/how little to qualify as &quot;Prelinger Mashup&quot;?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/928504</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:15:16 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I've got a new remix I'd love to share on Prelinger Mashups...It has extensive narration from an A/V Geeks clip (originally produced by NASA), and a CC-licensed soundtrack from a SoundCloud artist, wi...        <p>Posted by: LynFaber</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Are You Fit to Marry?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/559464</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:35:13 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        DVD copies are available from John E. Allen, Inc.email at jeainc@gmail.com        <p>Posted by: The Pook</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Film Strip collections</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/558494</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:11:29 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I just came across a large number of filmstrips from an old schoolhouse auction. They apperar to be from the 40s 0r 50s. Anybody know anything about them?        <p>Posted by: Tony Dykes</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: new prelinger mashup posted</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/557533</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:39:01 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Thank you!        <p>Posted by: LynFaber</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: new prelinger mashup posted</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/557531</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:17:10 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        moved.        <p>Posted by: Jeff Kaplan</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>new prelinger mashup posted</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/557513</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:00:03 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Hi,

Could an admin please move this file/page over to Prelinger Mashups?

BUILDING IS PEOPLE
http://archive.org/details/BuildingIsPeople

...this remix uses dozens of public-domain source reels out o...        <p>Posted by: LynFaber</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Happy 10 Year Anniversary.... to me!</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/553257</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:33:49 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I was checking the review dates on some of the earliest films I reviewed, around December 8, 2002 or so! WOOO! 10 years here. Still at it, can't stop.        <p>Posted by: Spuzz</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>FYI: bad upload to redo</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/527988</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:03:23 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Northwestern States (1956)

http://archive.org/details/Northwes1956        <p>Posted by: quickfoundnet</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Larger Resolution?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/509448</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:24:19 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        please send your request to info@archive.org for information on how to contact Prelinger archive.        <p>Posted by: Jeff Kaplan</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Larger Resolution?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/509359</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:54:32 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        First, its so great to find all of these amazing old films from the past here and be able to use them at will and for free. 
Thank you so much for the access and the work you've all done to make these...        <p>Posted by: kellibratty</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Pulldown in this year's uploads?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/450845</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:36:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        No automation yet.  So far, I'm simply identifying which sequences I need, and isolating frames semi-manually as described above.  I don't want to complain at all, though, because free is good.  Lots ...        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>FYI: bad uploads to redo</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/449690</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:50:35 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        A few more failed uploads I came across recently (nice Jam Handy Chevrolet films):

What Stops Them (1935)
http://archive.org/details/0797_What_Stops_Them_M

No Ghosts (1935)
http://archive.org/detail...        <p>Posted by: quickfoundnet</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Not all of our films are meant to entertain</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/448198</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 03:56:50 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Rick, much appreciated, keep 'em coming!        <p>Posted by: Scribble</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Pulldown in this year's uploads?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/448197</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 03:53:32 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I've been having similar results, a few videos actually worked quite well after removing pulldown, but the majority are just as you describe, mushy weird frames in between 3 or 4 nice, solid ones...

...        <p>Posted by: Scribble</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Could some old bad uploads be redone?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/440769</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:11:35 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Great. Thanks for all your fine work.        <p>Posted by: quickfoundnet</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Could some old bad uploads be redone?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/440768</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:02:30 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Good point. You may have noticed that we're re-uploading a bunch of films that were transferred poorly or digitized with errors. We'll get to this one. Thanks for calling this one out.        <p>Posted by: Rick Prelinger</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Could some old bad uploads be redone?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/440308</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 22:56:46 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        There are a few films in the Prelinger Archive that were never uploaded properly. Example:

Northwestern States (1956)
Encyclopaedia Britannica Films

http://archive.org/details/Northwes1956

has a pa...        <p>Posted by: quickfoundnet</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: New uploads over ten gigs each?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/438755</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:02:14 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        These were large files out of our film scanner that were not meant to be exposed online.        <p>Posted by: Rick Prelinger</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: New uploads over ten gigs each?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/438645</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:30:01 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I tried but failed to download one or two of these huge files, now they seem to be gone? Assuming it was some kind of mistake.        <p>Posted by: timdrage</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>New uploads over ten gigs each?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/437529</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:47:43 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        .
Are they scanned in full-tilt HD or something?
.        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Pulldown in this year's uploads?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/435103</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:18:09 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Oy.   Earlier in the year I had success transferring a few of these to DVD, but I guess I got lucky and picked &quot;good&quot; ones.  I just dumped a large load of these 2012 uploads to disc.  Results varied g...        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>City With A City</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/431065</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 19:31:15 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        So Rick,

What do you think is happening with that reel of &quot;City Within The City&quot;, that film about the construction of the Pan-Am building? Why do you think there's the negative dupe of that film (rev...        <p>Posted by: Spuzz</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Pulldown in this year's uploads?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/430897</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:27:22 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        First, off, great work on the huge number of 2012 uploads.  The recent videos are entertaining and often useful.

Question: Is there any info about the pulldown cadence of these files?  They seem sort...        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: All these TV Shows are  PD - So Where Are They Hiding?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/429928</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:20:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I have ordered in the ones for Medic but many episodes are missing.  And the disks are of such poor quality that they are unuseable.  

Save your money on the Volume 4 that is sold.  It's crap.  The o...        <p>Posted by: ddlabs31</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Behind Your Radio Dial - corrupt file</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/425450</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:37:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Is it possible this MPEG2 file is corrupt? I have tried repeatedly to download it and it fails and/or shows properties as an 11 hour clip and then will not play.        <p>Posted by: ChezAmber</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Sound Home Movies?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/425130</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 03:20:40 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        We have a very few. We can't transfer sound on the Internet Archive scanner, but some of our sound home movies will come in through our videotape digitization project. Please stay tuned.        <p>Posted by: Rick Prelinger</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Sound Home Movies?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/424699</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:25:48 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Sound home movies would be a real find!

When I was a kid, everybody's dad had 16mm or standard 8mm gear, with nary a sound recorder in sight.  Most home users wouldn't bother with the hassle and expe...        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Sound Home Movies?</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/424641</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:48:28 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        The majority you have are silent... any sound ones in the midst?        <p>Posted by: Spuzz</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Not all of our films are meant to entertain</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/424640</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:47:36 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I was about to &quot;like&quot; Frank's post. Grrrrrr can't do that.        <p>Posted by: Spuzz</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Not all of our films are meant to entertain</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423924</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:28:51 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I lurvs me some A&amp;amp;B rolls... for entertainment!        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: New Music video made with Prelinger footage</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423914</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:54:45 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        No problem!
Good luck with your next work!        <p>Posted by: VUSschneider</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: New Music video made with Prelinger footage</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423913</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:53:27 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        hey, glad you liked it!  I'm just starting out really doing this so the positive feedback is encouraging.  All the best to you!        <p>Posted by: golden death music</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: New Music video made with Prelinger footage</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423878</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:20:44 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        It`s a good combination of pictures and sounds. Some strange retro style feeling. Good editing and compositing.        <p>Posted by: VUSschneider</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Not all of our films are meant to entertain</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423877</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:18:53 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I think it`s a good choice! Thanks for that. It`s very interesting when working with the material and for others it`s interesteing to see things from different angles :)        <p>Posted by: VUSschneider</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Not all of our films are meant to entertain</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423874</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:26:14 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Not all films in our collection are release prints (prints manufactured to run through projectors). Many are original or preprint material, and some are A&amp;amp;B rolls (see below). I tried hard to coll...        <p>Posted by: Rick Prelinger</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Copyright discussions</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423830</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:15:31 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Hi,
is there any information about filmmakers who used public domain / nocopyright footage from archive.org in their projects?

I`m not sure about using and reselling clips from world war 2 footage an...        <p>Posted by: VUSschneider</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>New Prelinger Mashups Blog</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423799</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:56:25 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I've made a compilation, in blog form, of a number of my Prelinger Mash-ups. Please feel free to visit and comment.

http://blakesonmashup.blogspot.co.uk

Many thanks, once more, for this invaluable r...        <p>Posted by: othy1</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Looks like the latest encode is mostly cool!</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423589</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:42:29 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        mplayer (and ffplay, part of ffmpeg package, when compiled with config option -&quot;-enable-libopenjpeg&quot;) can play it.  (as these are very big images *and* JPEG-2000 compression (hard to decode-on-the-fly...        <p>Posted by: tracey pooh</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>New Music video made with Prelinger footage</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/423398</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:35:42 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwRm0V1GK8A&amp;amp;feature=plcp

Just finished a new video for my song Accommodation.  I used a lot of footage from the video &quot;how the eye works&quot;
Please let me know what yo...        <p>Posted by: golden death music</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: New Films</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/422409</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:30:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        The quality is much better but this clip appears to be reel 3 according to the older mpeg file        <p>Posted by: philips272</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Found it.</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/421000</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 06:04:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        After a bit of searching, I found it myself. 

http://archive.org/details/ivory_soap

Turns out the upload's metadata does not mention a date of production, but I'm still going to guess that it is fro...        <p>Posted by: i s a w d r o n e s</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Searching for a classic soap commercial (1960s/1970s)</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/420937</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:15:12 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Greetings,

Approximately a year ago, I downloaded a soap commercial from the Archive. Judging by my memory of the looks of the people involved, I would guess it was from the 1960s or 1970s. The audio...        <p>Posted by: i s a w d r o n e s</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>New Prelinger mashup posted</title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/420684</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:37:22 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Hi

Just a note that a new Prelinger mashiup is available in the Community Video section:

http://archive.org/details/ATownWithGoodRealEstatePeopleIsAMoreSubstantialCommunity_371

Could an admin kindl...        <p>Posted by: LynFaber</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Newest uploads are great! </title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/419667</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 04:35:46 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Sounds logical.  Last time I encountered a flying spot scanner was a long time ago.  It was a set-top unit that played Super 8 film on TV.  I saw one on a shelf at a Union Mission last year.  I probab...        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Newest uploads are great! </title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/419666</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 04:01:03 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        The jello effect you are seeing to often exists in the original transfer. The films were transferred with a telecine that has a line array CCD or flying spot (Cintel or Bosch FDL-60) where it's captur...        <p>Posted by: A/V Geeks</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Newest uploads are great! </title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/419549</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:38:54 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Other recent files, including the re-encodes, are similar.
That's too bad.
Unfortunately, the file from which I successfully pulled a clean 24fps sequence this past weekend was an older MPEG2 version,...        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Newest uploads are great! </title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/419503</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:37:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Thanks Frank...glad to know I'm not losing my mind!  It's a shame as many older encodes were easily converted to 24fps...        <p>Posted by: Scribble</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Newest uploads are great! </title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/419498</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:05:59 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Hm.  &quot;Sinclair&quot; looks fine for watching on the PC, and it looks good when burned to DVD for TV viewing.  However, NO native AE or expensive third-party plugins can break it down to clean 24fps output....        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Newest uploads are great! </title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/419491</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:19:45 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        I haven't tried &quot;Sinclair&quot; yet, but some other recent videos have been good candidates for pulldown removal.  When I have a spare few minutes I'll check Sinclair.  A few of the recent files have some ...        <p>Posted by: Frank Panucci</p>
      </description>
    </item>
        <item>
      <title>Re: Newest uploads are great! </title>
      <link>http://feeds.archive.org/post/419418</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:37:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <description>
        Hey guys...

Yes, the jello seems to be gone, but I had no luck removing pulldown properly from &quot;Sinclair at the Worlds Fair&quot;.  I use After Effects, which tries to guess the pulldown cadence, but is u...        <p>Posted by: Scribble</p>
      </description>
    </item>
      </channel>
</rss>
